A. Articles
http://takingnote.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/10/14/california-leads-the-way-on-climate-change/?ref=topics&_r=0
B. Analysis
Governor Jerry recently signed a new
climate law that is extremely important. The law includes three concrete and
legally binding clean-energy initiatives. One provision doubles down on
efficiency, mandating a 100 percent increase in energy savings in California’s
homes, businesses and factories — an ambitious goal that, by some estimates,
could reduce statewide energy needs by nearly a third by 2030. Another requires
utilities to purchase half of their power from renewable sources like wind and
solar by 2030, with penalties for non-compliance; still another provides new
incentives for utilities to install additional charging stations, the shortage
of which is a major roadblock to what appears to be a growing appetite for
electric vehicles.
C. Bullet Answers
1. Global/National/Local/Personal
Impacts
Global: Sadly, the United States is
falling behind when it comes to wind energy initiatives. Right now California
is making great strides to catch us up with other western countries, like
Germany and Norway for example. The United State’s media is broadcasted around
the world, and we set the tone for many countries. For those countries that
aren’t putting their focuses towards wind energy, the USA could possibly be setting
an example for them.
National: Clearly California is the
most forward thinking state when it comes to wind energy, and they are setting
the tone for other states that are falling behind them. We need to look up to
California and follow in their footsteps so we don’t leave more CARBON
footsteps!
Local: Our wind energy accounts for
16% of electricity generated in the state. This is not awful, but it’s not
great either.
Personal: I would love to see more
wind farms and be able to tell my kids about them, and how they help the earth.
2. Impact over time Short term/long
term
Short Term: Job creation! We could
create new jobs within the USA for new wind farms. Wind farms could be used as
an artistic installation. We could paint different things on the wings or even
allow artists to paint on the wings, this creating something beautiful from the
metal machinery.
Long Term: Less pollution! Better
breathing! Increased health! Less medical debt!
3. Positive Outcome
Wind energy doesn’t produce
atmospheric emissions that cause acid rain or greenhouse gases.
4. Negative Outcome
Some people could lose jobs at power
plants and it could increase taxes for some.
5. Lens/Region of the Future : Super
tech - Limit Tech and Human Tech / Social Tech.
Short Term Job creation, I think would cancel out the power plant job loses. Maybe those that are impacted with job loss from one can be guaranteed positions in new wind farm locations, with provided training, and increase in benefits or something.
ReplyDeleteI also would love to see more wind farms around, I know that some cities outside of Mpls are putting more of these up around the metro area. I know Maple Grove and Shakopee, near the reservation have more than a few in their area. According to Wikipedia, wind power accounts "16% of the electricity generated in the state during 2014" Wiki's not the best for info, but hey...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power_in_Minnesota